🔬

AI Risk Skepticism

📅 2021
technical research breakthrough
🔵 Rare

📖 Description

1 AI Risk Skepticism Roman V. Yampolskiy Computer Science and Engineering University of Louisville [email removed] Abstract In this work, we survey skepticism regarding AI risk and show parallels with other types of scientific skepticism . We start by classifying different types of AI Risk skepticism and analyze their root causes. We conclude by suggest ing some intervention approaches, which may be successful in reducing AI risk skepticism , at least amongst artificial intelligence researchers. Keywords: AI Risk, AI Risk Skeptic ism, AI Risk Denialism , AI Safety, Existential Risk . 1. Introduction to AI Risk Skepticism It has been predicted that if recent advanceme nt in machine learning continue uninterrupted , human -level or even superintelligent Artificially Intelligent (AI) systems will be designed at some point in the near future [1]. Currently available (and near -term predicted) AI software is subhuman in...

📊 Game Impacts

Variable Change Condition
Research +15 Always
Papers +10 Always
Vibey Doom +3 Always

💭 Reactions

🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Notable work on AI safety"
📰 Media Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Peer-reviewed publication"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here

🔗 Sources

🏷️ Event Metadata

Think this event's metadata could be improved? Suggest changes to category, rarity, tags, game impacts, or p(doom) effects.

📁 Category Technical Research Breakthrough → Suggest different category
⭐ Rarity 🔵 Rare → Suggest different rarity
🏷️ Tags (0) → Suggest tag changes
📊 Game Impacts (3) 3 variable changes → Suggest impact changes
☢️ p(Doom) Impact No direct impact → Suggest p(doom) change
📝 General Metadata Year, description, reactions → Comprehensive review

🤝 Found an Issue?

This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:

GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)
← Back to All Events