The Singularity Controversy, Part I: Lessons Learned and Open Questions: Conclusions from the Battle on the Legitimacy of the Debate
📖 Description
Technical Report STR 2016-1 ? January 2016 arXiv:1601.05977 [cs.AI] ? DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.3416.6809 THE SINGULARITY CONTROVERSY Part I: Lessons Learned and Open Questions: Conclusions from the Battle on the Legitimacy of the Debate Amnon H. Eden Sapience Project 2016 SYNOPSIS This report seeks to inform policy makers on the na ture and the merit of the arguments for and against the concerns associated with a potential te chnological singularity. Part I describes the lessons learned from our invest igation of the subject, separating the argu- ments of merit from the fallacies and misconceptions that confuse the debate and undermine its rational resolution. ACM Computing Classification System (CCS 2012) : Computing methodologies~Philosophi- cal/theoretical foundations of artificial intellige nce ? Social and professional topics~Codes of ethics ? 2 ? CONTENTS Motivation 4 Studying the Singularity 5 Conclusions drawn 6 Conclusion (A) : S...
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +15 | Always |
| Papers | +10 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +3 | Always |
💭 Reactions
"Advances our understanding of AI safety"
"Published in academic venue"
🔗 Sources
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)