📢

Extrapolating GPT-N performance

📅 2020
public awareness
⚪ Common
#ai #ai timelines #gpt #language models

📖 Description

[Brown et al. (2020)](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165.pdf) (which describes the development of GPT-3) contains measurements of how 8 transformers of different sizes perform on several different benchmarks. In this post, I project how performance could improve for larger models, and give an overview of issues that may appear when scaling-up. Note that these benchmarks are for 'downstream tasks' that are different from the training task (which is to predict the next token); these extrapolations thus cannot be directly read off the scaling laws in OpenAI's Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models ([Kaplan et al., 2020](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.08361.pdf)) or Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelling ([Henighan et al., 2020](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.14701.pdf)).

📊 Game Impacts

Variable Change Condition
Research +10 Always
Vibey Doom +2 Always

💭 Reactions

🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Useful research for the community"
📰 Media Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here

🔗 Sources

🏷️ Event Metadata

Think this event's metadata could be improved? Suggest changes to category, rarity, tags, game impacts, or p(doom) effects.

🤝 Found an Issue?

This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:

GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)
← Back to All Events