📢

[Linkpost] Existential Risk Analysis in Empirical Research Papers

📅 2022
public awareness
🔵 Rare
#ai #ai risk #existential risk

📖 Description

I've noted before that it can be difficult to separate progress in safety from progress in capabilities. However, doing so is important, as we want to ensure that we are making differential progress on safety, rather than just advancing safety as a consequence of advancing capabilities. In particular, I think that research should rigorously evaluate trade-offs between improving safety and advancing capabilities.

📊 Game Impacts

Variable Change Condition
Research +5 Always
Vibey Doom +5 Always

💭 Reactions

🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Critical insights for the field"
📰 Media Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here

🔗 Sources

🏷️ Event Metadata

Think this event's metadata could be improved? Suggest changes to category, rarity, tags, game impacts, or p(doom) effects.

📁 Category Public Awareness → Suggest different category
⭐ Rarity 🔵 Rare → Suggest different rarity
🏷️ Tags (3) ai, ai risk, existential risk → Suggest tag changes
📊 Game Impacts (2) 2 variable changes → Suggest impact changes
☢️ p(Doom) Impact No direct impact → Suggest p(doom) change
📝 General Metadata Year, description, reactions → Comprehensive review

🤝 Found an Issue?

This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:

GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)
← Back to All Events