Reply to Eliezer on Biological Anchors
📖 Description
The ["biological anchors" method for forecasting transformative AI](https://www.cold-takes.com/forecasting-transformative-ai-the-biological-anchors-method-in-a-nutshell/) is the biggest non-[trust-based](https://www.cold-takes.com/minimal-trust-investigations/#navigating-trust) input into my thinking about likely timelines for transformative AI. While I'm sympathetic to parts of [Eliezer Yudkowsky's recent post on it](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ax695frGJEzGxFBK4/biology-inspired-agi-timelines-the-trick-that-never-works), I overall disagree with the post, and think it's easy to get a misimpression of the "biological anchors" report (which I'll abbreviate as **"Bio Anchors"**) - and Open Philanthropy's take on it - by reading it.
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +10 | Always |
💭 Reactions
"Provides general AI context"
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🔗 Sources
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)