Debate Minus Factored Cognition
📖 Description
[AI safety via debate](https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/wo6NsBtn3WJDCeWsx/ai-safety-via-debate) has been, so far, associated with [Factored Cognition](https://www.alignmentforum.org/s/EmDuGeRw749sD3GKd). There are good reasons for this. For one thing, Factored Cognition gives us a potential *gold standard for amplification* -- what it means to give very, very good answers to questions. Namely, HCH. To the extent that we buy HCH as a gold standard, proving that debate approximates HCH in some sense would give us some assurances about what it is accomplishing.
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +10 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +2 | Always |
| Ethics Risk | -5 | Always |
💭 Reactions
🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Adds to our knowledge base"
"Adds to our knowledge base"
📰 Media Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🔗 Sources
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)