📜

Rant on Problem Factorization for Alignment

📅 2022
policy development
⚪ Common
#ai #debate (ai safety technique) #factored cognition #humans consulting hch #ought

📖 Description

This post is the second in what is likely to become a series of uncharitable rants about alignment proposals (previously: [Godzilla Strategies](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/DwqgLXn5qYC7GqExF/godzilla-strategies)). In general, these posts are intended to convey my underlying intuitions. They are *not* intended to convey my all-things-considered, reflectively-endorsed opinions. In particular, my all-things-considered reflectively-endorsed opinions are usually more kind. But I think it is valuable to make the underlying, not-particularly-kind intuitions publicly-visible, so people can debate underlying generators directly. I apologize in advance to all the people I insult in the process.

📊 Game Impacts

Variable Change Condition
Research +5 Always
Vibey Doom +2 Always
Ethics Risk -5 Always

💭 Reactions

🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Adds to our knowledge base"
📰 Media Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here

🔗 Sources

🏷️ Event Metadata

Think this event's metadata could be improved? Suggest changes to category, rarity, tags, game impacts, or p(doom) effects.

🤝 Found an Issue?

This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:

GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)
← Back to All Events