Three mental images from thinking about AGI debate & corrigibility
📖 Description
Here are three mental images I've used when sporadically struggling to understand the ideas and prospects for [AI safety via debate](https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00899), [IDA, and related proposals](https://www.alignmentforum.org/s/EmDuGeRw749sD3GKd). I have not been closely following the discussion, and may well be missing things, and I don't know whether these mental images are helpful or misleading.
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +5 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +2 | Always |
| Ethics Risk | -5 | Always |
💭 Reactions
🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Adds to our knowledge base"
"Adds to our knowledge base"
📰 Media Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)