📜

Ngo and Yudkowsky on AI capability gains

📅 2021
policy development
🔵 Rare
#ai #ai governance #ai takeoff #effective altruism #modest epistemology #optimization #recursive self-improvement #utility functions

📖 Description

This is the second post in a series of transcribed conversations about AGI forecasting and alignment. See the [first post](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/7im8at9PmhbT4JHsW/ngo-and-yudkowsky-on-alignment-difficulty) for prefaces and more information about the format.

📊 Game Impacts

Variable Change Condition
Research +10 Always
Vibey Doom +5 Always
Ethics Risk -5 Always

💭 Reactions

🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Critical insights for the field"
📰 Media Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here

🔗 Sources

🏷️ Event Metadata

Think this event's metadata could be improved? Suggest changes to category, rarity, tags, game impacts, or p(doom) effects.

📁 Category Policy Development → Suggest different category
⭐ Rarity 🔵 Rare → Suggest different rarity
🏷️ Tags (8) ai, ai governance, ai takeoff, effective altruism, modest epistemology, optimization, recursive self-improvement, utility functions → Suggest tag changes
📊 Game Impacts (3) 3 variable changes → Suggest impact changes
☢️ p(Doom) Impact No direct impact → Suggest p(doom) change
📝 General Metadata Year, description, reactions → Comprehensive review

🤝 Found an Issue?

This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:

GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)
← Back to All Events