📢

What are some exercises for building/generating intuitions about key disagreements in AI alignment?

📅 2020
public awareness
⚪ Common
#intuition

📖 Description

I am interested in having my own opinion about more of the [key disagreements](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mJ5oNYnkYrd4sD5uE/clarifying-some-key-hypotheses-in-ai-alignment) within the AI alignment field, such as whether there is a basin of attraction for corrigibility, whether there is [a theory of rationality that is sufficiently precise to build hierarchies of abstraction](https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/suxvE2ddnYMPJN9HD/realism-about-rationality/comment/YMNwHcPNPd4pDK7MR), and to what extent there will be a [competence gap](https://agentfoundations.org/item?id=64).

📊 Game Impacts

Variable Change Condition
Research +5 Always
Vibey Doom +2 Always
Ethics Risk -5 Always

💭 Reactions

🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Useful research for the community"
📰 Media Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here

🔗 Sources

🏷️ Event Metadata

Think this event's metadata could be improved? Suggest changes to category, rarity, tags, game impacts, or p(doom) effects.

📁 Category Public Awareness → Suggest different category
⭐ Rarity ⚪ Common → Suggest different rarity
🏷️ Tags (1) intuition → Suggest tag changes
📊 Game Impacts (3) 3 variable changes → Suggest impact changes
☢️ p(Doom) Impact No direct impact → Suggest p(doom) change
📝 General Metadata Year, description, reactions → Comprehensive review

🤝 Found an Issue?

This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:

GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)
← Back to All Events