Proxy misspecification and the capabilities vs. value learning race
📖 Description
G Gordon Worley III [recently complained](https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/sSpu2EABtTTDmBZ6T/g-gordon-worley-iii-s-shortform?commentId=tbj8R6K2q9rfhjtS7) about a lack of precision in discussions about whether Goodhart's Law will present a fatal problem for alignment in practice. After attending a talk in which Dylan Hadfield-Menell[[1]](#fntkb71ztt8d) presented the "Goodhart's Law will be a big deal" perspective, I came away with a relatively concrete formulation of where I disagree. In this post I'll try to explain my model for this, expanding on my short comment [here](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/sSpu2EABtTTDmBZ6T/g-gordon-worley-iii-s-shortform?commentId=s4qu4hNykRmv8hALo).
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +15 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +5 | Always |
| Ethics Risk | -5 | Always |
💭 Reactions
"This is a significant contribution to alignment research"
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)