🔬

Proxy misspecification and the capabilities vs. value learning race

📅 2022
technical research breakthrough
🔵 Rare
#ai #goodhart's law

📖 Description

G Gordon Worley III [recently complained](https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/sSpu2EABtTTDmBZ6T/g-gordon-worley-iii-s-shortform?commentId=tbj8R6K2q9rfhjtS7) about a lack of precision in discussions about whether Goodhart's Law will present a fatal problem for alignment in practice. After attending a talk in which Dylan Hadfield-Menell[[1]](#fntkb71ztt8d) presented the "Goodhart's Law will be a big deal" perspective, I came away with a relatively concrete formulation of where I disagree. In this post I'll try to explain my model for this, expanding on my short comment [here](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/sSpu2EABtTTDmBZ6T/g-gordon-worley-iii-s-shortform?commentId=s4qu4hNykRmv8hALo).

📊 Game Impacts

Variable Change Condition
Research +15 Always
Vibey Doom +5 Always
Ethics Risk -5 Always

💭 Reactions

🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"This is a significant contribution to alignment research"
📰 Media Reaction: ⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here

🔗 Sources

🏷️ Event Metadata

Think this event's metadata could be improved? Suggest changes to category, rarity, tags, game impacts, or p(doom) effects.

🤝 Found an Issue?

This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:

GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)
← Back to All Events