Acceptability Verification: A Research Agenda
📖 Description
[This Google doc^](https://docs.google.com/document/d/199Lkh78UA2uI9ljLEy_aWR8RBetQLRO6Kqo3_Omi1e4/view) is a halted, formerly work-in-progress writeup of [Evan Hubinger's](https://www.lesswrong.com/users/evhub) AI alignment research agenda, authored by Evan. It dates back to around 2020, and so Evan's views on alignment have shifted since then.
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +5 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +2 | Always |
| Ethics Risk | -5 | Always |
💭 Reactions
🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Interesting perspective on safety challenges"
"Interesting perspective on safety challenges"
📰 Media Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)