Making it harder for an AGI to "trick" us, with STVs
📖 Description
| | | --- | | Summary / PreambleAI Alignment has various sub-areas. The area I focus on here is ways we might use a superintelligent AGI-system to help with creating an aligned AGI-system, even if the AGI we start out with isn't fully aligned.Imagine a superintelligence that "pretends" to be aligned. Such an AI may give output that *seems* to us like what we want. But for some types of requests, it's very hard to give output that *seems* to us like what we want without it *actually* being what we want (even for a superintelligence). Can we obtain new capabilities by making such requests, in such a way that the scope of things we can ask for in a safe way (without being "tricked" or manipulated) is increased? And if so, is it possible to eventually end up with an aligned AGI-system?One reason for exploring such strategies is contingency planning (what if we haven't solved alignment by the time the first superintelligent AGI-system arrives?). Another reason is that additional layers ...
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +10 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +5 | Always |
| Ethics Risk | -5 | Always |
💭 Reactions
"This is a significant contribution to alignment research"
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)