Vaniver's ELK Submission
📖 Description
*You can see the actual submission (including a more formalized model)* [*here*](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VQcRtsPsf7-Yp6OfucyErpKm6YEdQR-mlNQciq5ZKC0/edit?usp=sharing)*, and the contest details* [*here*](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/QEYWkRoCn4fZxXQAY/prizes-for-elk-proposals)*. I've reordered things to be more natural as a blog post / explain the rationale / intuition a bit better. This didn't get a prize, tho it may have been because I didn't try to fit the ELK format.*
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +10 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +5 | Always |
| Ethics Risk | -5 | Always |
💭 Reactions
🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Critical insights for the field"
"Critical insights for the field"
📰 Media Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)