Reply to Jebari and Lundborg on Artificial Superintelligence
📖 Description
Jebari and Lundborg have recently published an article entitled [*Artificial superintelligence and its limits: why AlphaZero cannot become a general agent*](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-020-01070-3). It focuses on the thorny issue of agency in superintelligent AIs. I'm glad to see more work on this crucial topic; however, I have significant disagreements with their terminology and argumentation, as I outline in this reply. Note that it was written rather quickly, and so might lack clarity in some places, or fail to convey some nuances of the original article. I welcome comments and further responses.
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +5 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +5 | Always |
| Ethics Risk | -5 | Always |
💭 Reactions
🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Important work advancing our understanding of AI safety"
"Important work advancing our understanding of AI safety"
📰 Media Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)