Precursor checking for deceptive alignment
📖 Description
This post is primarily an excerpt from "[Acceptability Verification: a Research Agenda](https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/GeabLEXYP7oBMivmF/acceptability-verification-a-research-agenda)" that I think is useful enough on its own such that I've spun it off into its own post.
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +10 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +5 | Always |
| Ethics Risk | -5 | Always |
💭 Reactions
🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Important work advancing our understanding of AI safety"
"Important work advancing our understanding of AI safety"
📰 Media Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)