Box inversion hypothesis
📖 Description
*This text originated from a retreat in late 2018, where researchers from FHI, MIRI and CFAR did an extended double-crux on AI safety paradigms, with Eric Drexler and Scott Garrabrant in the core. In the past two years I tried to improve it in terms of understandability multiple times, but empirically it seems quite inadequate. As it seems unlikely I will have time to invest further work into improving it, I'm publishing it as it is, with the hope that someone else will maybe understand the ideas even at this form, and describe them more clearly.*
📊 Game Impacts
| Variable | Change | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Research | +10 | Always |
| Vibey Doom | +2 | Always |
💭 Reactions
🔬 Safety Researcher Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Adds to our knowledge base"
"Adds to our knowledge base"
📰 Media Reaction:
⚠️ Placeholder - Needs Real Quote
"Discussed in AI safety community"
💡 Found a Real Quote? Suggest it here
"Discussed in AI safety community"
🤝 Found an Issue?
This event data is sourced from the pdoom-data repository. If you notice errors or want to suggest improvements:
GitHub Issue (Preferred) 📧 Email (No GitHub)